They (you know who they are) want to destroy everything they cannot control, cont.

pls look closer at the christmas tree farms and ask about the wild forest that used to be there. and if you are not convinced that the beingness of the forest is worth preserving for its own sake, then how about this: a living interdependent forest is actually potential worth far more than the christmas tree farm - the forest is more valuable than lumber. ask about the wild forest conditions that allow the christmas tree farms to grow in soil has not not been exhausted by our agricultural methods. any culture that stops rotating crops and letting the fields lie fallow is too desperate for cash to see the damage that our techniques to do the thick rich soil natural conditions left for us to exploit. to continue w/ the forest - what gave the europeans who come to the Americas the impression that the rich forests and bays full of life 'just happened?' to acknowledge the native land management practices dismisses the illusion that the land is not being used and there for there for the taking of the industrious European, whose homeland had lain fallow during the dark age and recovered enough to feed the population explosion that continues to this day. shut the fuck up whitey, i know the poor master race is not exploding as fast as the poor races of the southern hemisphere, and all over europe white people seem disinclined to bring a child into this world. America and nature were based on a set of deceptions concerning the nature of nature, and the rôle traditional cutltures play in nurturing usefull plants, guiding variation that produce for instance over 200 varieties of potatoes, each attuned to a particular microclimate.

the christmas tree farms will fail w/out inputs because growing christmas trees as a crop does not replenish the soil, which in the meantime is also eroding away faster. since to get the most out of the crop the farmer cannot allow forest conditions to emerge naturally - a natural catastrophe like a forest fire and clear cutting have similarities and glaring differences. both result in a period of the prevalence of weeds. define weeds as quick growing plant that creates conditions in the soil ideal for its rapid propagation and the elimination of competitors. agriculture has increasing depended on an ecocatastrophe to clear the way for profits over sustainability.

and there's the difference between a tree farm and extracting value from a living forest. the tree farm requires a modicum of work relative to the potentially size-able return in large cold hard beautifull cash, if you are savvy and work the system, and even the less venial farmers can make a good quick buck, compared to a sustainable enterprise utilizing the forest - to maintain balance and guarantee the greatest return from managing a forest in the old way requires most of having an intimate relationship to the forest. the single greatest value of the forest: it's biodiversity, is where the fortune is to be made - or are you unaware that you cannot patent the whole plant but do get an patent when you isolate the 'active' ingredient. a plant like chocolate has hundreds of chemicals and scientists have studied the effects of many of them but not all and don't have the financial nor theoreticall resources to investigate the interactions of several chemicals at once. if substances are banal as epson salts turn to an unpleasant goop in the bath if you add olive oil soap before the epson salts have disolved. i have no indication of either epson salt or Dr. Bronners behaviour independently that mixed together under certain replicable that a weird and rather gross mixing results. that is a demonstration of many thing you can try the next time you take a bath. one demonstration concerns starting conditions. if the salts are dissolved enough the goop will not happen when you add the soap. those conditions rely on varients as simple as how hot you run your bath..

They (you know who they are) want to destroy everything they cannot control

i feel like they (you know which 'they' i mean) are intent on destroying everything they can't control.">

Take this next statement srsly: if we do not restore the habitat of wild cacao trees immediately there will be no more chocolate. the plantations of cocao trees are a declining clone line. eventually all the lines of cloned trees in plantations will fail: the cacao does not sexually reproduce in captivity. experts in chocolate cannot identify all the factors necessary to induce the plant to go to maturity. w/ deforestation and other forms of habitat loss (like the 'accidental' release of an incredible amount of pollution extracting petroleum in the rainforest). i am breaking it down in stages,now i spell it out: if we do stop wantonly destroying biologically diverse environments to increase production of goods for export. then. chocolate production will trickle to a halt, and there will be no wild cacao trees left. the unique conditions in which cacao exists in an dynamic web of living interactions will no longer exist and cacao will another extinct species lost as a direct result of our voracity of poor wildlife management. because once the great die off is over, nature will be carefull preserved until the last forests are an embarrassment and bruce dern goes nuts when word comes down that due to budget concern the last of earths forests are scheduled to be destroyed. i choose chocolate because many people use it as a sacrament against stress, which is the disease of our age. the entire planet is in distress to satisfy our need for more. Alice Miller and Ray Kurzweil both (to cite a children's advocate who divorced herself from psychoanalysis when she realized that Freud covered up for Victorian Vienna and by extension everyone by retreating from the truth about child abuse. his theory about infantile sexuality and his set of maturation dramas is a lie to put a fancy word on "you can't rely on children to not tell on us" - even if the New Pope on a Mission from God to Save the Catholic Church from paying reparations whose lives were destroyed by rapists in the priesthood, whose lives were destroyed by a culture of denial in the Church and in Society as a whole. The pain and suffering of the victims must be diminished, made the victims fault "how cd it be rape when she didn't fight?" The Pope's Sacred Mission to not part with a dime stoops to no smear too foul to discredit those whose testimony indicts an institution immune to the suffering it inflicts. But i see no difference btwn the Pope and say the C.E.O. of Union Carbide who has suffered no personal consequences nor has the corporation been forced to make the payments an indian court ordered Union Carbide to pay for the 'accidental' release of toxic gas (those closest began to hemorrage from every oriface and died on the spot) those far enough away from exposure to an immediately fatal dose suffer from a profound collapse of their health, often requiring extensive treatment. A doctor who set up a clinic on site to treat people was quickly shut down so that no one would panic. i guess if we don't panic we are easier to control.

The internal contradictions of the radical communities that both nurtured and oppressed me while i was busy losing my mind

shit. i just evaporated my essay not pasting before i copied something else. crap. come back later.